For lawyers & legal counsel

Privilege-aware by design. AI on demand. You in the loop.

The legal profession's caution around AI note tools is straightforward. Privilege analysis turns on no third party having seen the communication, and many SaaS tools introduce exactly that third party. Korely is built the other way around: the vault lives on your encrypted disk, AI tools query it through MCP, and you see each tool call before it runs.

Case files

Every case file, on your disk, indexed

Picture the partner's office at any small firm: a row of locked file cabinets, one cabinet per active matter, folders labelled by client, exhibits filed in the back. Korely is the digital version of that cabinet. Folders per case, sub-folders per matter, exhibits in the attachments/ folder of your vault. The cabinet stays inside the office.

Concretely: drop a deposition PDF, the text gets indexed alongside your notes. Drop a client email, the same. Three months later, a search such as "the email where Smith agreed to indemnify" surfaces the right thread with full context. The entity graph tracks parties, opposing counsel, witnesses, and statutes mentioned across matters: useful for conflict checks and for noticing that a deposition you took last quarter is relevant to today's research.

Privilege

How the privilege model is set up

Picture a meeting room with one door. You and your client are inside. The door has a sign-in sheet, and nobody enters without your knowledge. Free Korely is the digital equivalent: the only person looking at the notes is you, on your own machine. No SaaS processor sits silently behind the wall.

Concretely, on Free:

  • The vault is a folder of Markdown files on your encrypted disk.
  • The basic transcription runs locally with Whisper, no cloud transcription service in the chain.
  • The search index lives in SQLite on your disk.
  • There is no telemetry of note content.

Pro cloud sync reintroduces a third party (Korely cloud), which is a separate analysis. Before turning cloud sync on for privileged matter, look at your jurisdiction's rules and your firm's policies. The point of Free is that you do not have to.

AI on demand

AI that asks before it reads

Picture an outside consultant who knocks at your office door every time they need a document, waits for you to hand it over, and never wanders the file cabinet on their own. That is the shape of how AI assistants interact with Korely through MCP.

Each time an assistant such as Claude or Cursor wants to access your vault, it issues a tool call. The MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor) shows you the call before it runs. You approve or reject. The assistant gets back only the specific text it requested, not the whole vault. Nothing is uploaded once and forever. The opt-in is at the level of each individual interaction.

If you decide that certain matters should never reach any AI tool, do not add Korely to that tool's MCP sources. The vault keeps working without the integration.

A working day

A working day inside the case file

Picture a normal week in active litigation. Three ways Korely earns its place on the desk.

  • Monday morning, case prep. Open the matter folder, hit the search bar, ask "every mention of the warranty clause across our internal memos". Korely returns the relevant paragraphs from your notes, the deposition transcripts in attachments/, and the email threads you saved as Markdown. Build the timeline of the dispute in fifteen minutes instead of an afternoon.
  • Wednesday, drafting a brief in Cursor. Ask Cursor (with Korely as an MCP source) to pull "every passage from the depositions where Smith discussed the supplier change". The assistant fetches the right excerpts, you draft the section of the brief on top, with each quote linked back to the source transcript so you can cite confidently.
  • Friday, conflict check on a new matter. Use the entity graph to scan your vault for every previous touchpoint with the parties involved. Names, opposing counsel, witnesses, statutes that come up across matters all surface in seconds, with the source notes one click away.

This page describes what the software does. It is not legal advice or a compliance certification. Whether Free Korely or Pro fits your jurisdiction's privilege and ethics rules is a question for your bar association or law society, your firm's compliance team, and the relevant ethics opinions in your jurisdiction.

Frequently asked

Does using Korely waive privilege? +

Privilege analysis turns on whether a third party gained access to the communication. Free Korely is fully local: no third-party processor sees your notes, which removes a waiver path that a SaaS note app would create. Pro cloud sync reintroduces a third-party processor. Before using Pro (or any cloud tool) for privileged content, consult your bar association or law society and your firm policies.

Can Korely handle deposition transcripts and exhibits? +

Yes. Drop transcripts as PDF or .docx (the importer extracts the text) and exhibit images into a case folder. Korely indexes both. A search such as "the deposition where Smith mentioned the contract" pulls the right transcript with surrounding context.

Will my notes leak through the AI integration? +

MCP, the protocol Korely uses to talk to Claude, Cursor, and similar assistants, sends only the specific text the assistant requests, not the whole vault. You see each tool call before it runs and approve or reject it. If you do not want any AI tool seeing privileged content, do not add Korely to that tool MCP sources. The vault keeps working without it.

The case file built for the questions counsel actually asks

No SaaS in the chain on Free. AI through MCP only when you approve the call. Pro cloud sync is opt-in and a separate decision.